Problem to initialize my Aladin eToken Pro

[anonymous]

I try to use a Aladin eToken Pro on my gentoo box. After install opensc 0.10.1 I attack my token and try to make some test:

opensc-tool --list-readers
Readers known about:
Nr.    Driver     Name
0      openct     Aladdin eToken PRO
1      openct     OpenCT reader (detached)
2      openct     OpenCT reader (detached)
3      openct     OpenCT reader (detached)
4      openct     OpenCT reader (detached)

opensc-tool --reader 0 --atr
3b:e2:00:ff:c1:10:31:fe:55:c8:02:9c

opensc-tool --reader 0 --name
CardOS M4

But, when I try to Erase & Initialize my Token

pkcs15-init -ECv
Connecting to card in reader Aladdin eToken PRO...
Using card driver Siemens CardOS.
profile.c:299:sc_profile_load: you need to set profile_dir in your config file.
pkcs15-lib.c:343:sc_pkcs15init_bind: Failed to load profile: File not found
Couldn't bind to the card: File not found

Can someone help me ?!

Thx a lot

[aj]

check your opensc.conf file: is profile_dir set? it needs to be set to the directory with the *.profile files, usualy /usr/share/opensc/

maybe you upgraded from an older version? replace the config file with the updated version and you should be fine.

[anonymous]

no, default gentoo install. I must set it on opensc.conf or openct.conf file ? may u post your both file ?

thx a lot

[aj]

edit opensc.conf. by default we create one that has the right setting, see etc/opensc.conf in the source code.

[martin]

This ticket has been idle for 5 months. Can somebody identify here a problem or a possible bug? If there is no real identified bug or problem there can't be a milestone for what it could be fixed...

[airforce1]

thanks get a cool air force ones

[china]

china tour Apparel shoes bags Kitchen Food and Wine Furniture) Flowers and Gifts Wall Art Computer Components

I still prefer a wiki like approach since the php (or mysql) docs are very cluttered when you have to take their comments in account. On the other hand they are professionally maintained imho, since they are *much* better than KDE documentation. KDE is by far larger and has so many different apps, which need screenshots and end user not dev/api docs, that more help is needed as long as the devs prefer to code than to write nice docs. And it is their choice to some degree imo. Technically interested but non-dev end users, which are plenty out there, are the users of and the best contributers to the docs, since they know what to write about. And they are certainly more than devs